With less than three weeks remaining before Election Day, the contest for Minnesota’s open United States Senate seat is showing signs of tightening between Democratic Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan and Republican nominee Michele Tafoya. The candidates are vying to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Tina Smith, who has endorsed Flanagan as her preferred successor, according to The Hill. Recent statewide polling places Flanagan ahead by a narrow margin within the sampling error, prompting political analysts to examine whether Republicans can mount a rare statewide victory in a state where they have not won a Senate election in nearly a quarter-century.

The competitive stretch unfolds as both candidates prepare for their only scheduled general election debate on Friday, hosted by MPR News. While Tafoya, a former longtime NFL sideline reporter, has focused her campaign on tying the current state administration to a major social-services fraud scandal, Flanagan is leaning on her governing experience—spanning from school board member and state lawmaker to lieutenant governor—while scrutinizing Tafoya’s policy positions on reproductive rights.

Polling Shows Narrow Lead and Divided Electorate

Two surveys conducted between October 5 and October 7 indicate a closely contested race, though they differ slightly on the exact margin and the share of undecided voters. According to a Minnesota Star Tribune and KARE 11 telephone poll of 800 likely voters, Flanagan holds 47% support to Tafoya’s 43%, with 9% undecided and less than 1% backing another candidate. The four-point gap falls close to the survey’s margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. Meanwhile, a Rasmussen Reports survey of 856 likely voters conducted over the same dates found Flanagan leading 48% to 45%, with 7% unsure and a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Following the release of the Star Tribune/KARE 11 survey, Fox News shifted its Power Rankings for the Minnesota contest from “Likely Democrat” to “Lean Democrat.” While the rating adjustment reflects a competitive environment, both major October polls continue to show Flanagan with a slight edge.

Beneath the topline numbers, the Star Tribune/KARE 11 data reveals sharp geographic and demographic divisions across the state:

  • Regional Splits: Flanagan holds a commanding 63% to 26% advantage in the core urban counties of Hennepin and Ramsey. Conversely, Tafoya leads 46% to 44% in the surrounding Twin Cities metro area, 54% to 37% in northern Minnesota, and 55% to 38% in southern Minnesota.
  • Gender Divide: Women favor Flanagan by a margin of 55% to 34%, whereas men back Tafoya 54% to 38%.
  • Independent Voters: Published accounts of the poll’s independent subgroup vary. KARE 11 reports that independents favor Tafoya 40% to 35% with 24% undecided, while The Hill reports the same poll showing Tafoya leading among independents 38% to 32% with 29% undecided.

State Fraud Scandal and Administrative Oversight

A central pillar of Tafoya’s campaign is a widespread welfare and social-services fraud scandal that has drawn national attention for nearly a year and factored into Democratic Gov. Tim Walz’s decision to abandon a 2026 re-election bid, according to Fox News. As reported by The Hill, a federal probe into a widespread money-laundering scheme has resulted in charges against more than 98 people since 2022, prompting Walz to launch audits covering more than a dozen Medicaid services.

Tafoya has argued that the Walz-Flanagan administration bears oversight responsibility for the losses, telling Fox News Digital that the stolen funds hollowed out vital assistance programs for children’s meals, autistic youth, and senior wellness visits. “Walz understood that he was not going to win another term as governor with these conditions, but my opponent thinks she deserves a promotion. I think people are starting to realize she deserves a pink slip,” Tafoya stated.

Flanagan and her campaign have condemned the criminal schemes while distinguishing administrative governance from criminal culpability. Flanagan has stated she is “incredibly angry with the fraud” and acknowledged voter frustration over the abuses.

Competing Narratives on Reproductive Rights

While Republicans focus on state management, Democrats have scrutinized Tafoya’s stance on abortion access. According to Bring Me The News, Tafoya has described herself as a pro-choice Republican who opposes an outright ban, while stating that abortion should be legal only within 12 weeks of conception.

That position contrasts with current Minnesota state law, which permits abortion at all stages of pregnancy. Democratic critics have characterized Tafoya’s proposed 12-week cutoff—along with her endorsement from Donald Trump and past support for conservative judicial appointments—as an endorsement of restrictive abortion bans, creating a central policy clash ahead of Election Day.

Campaign Spending Remains Subdued

Despite the narrowing polls, the general election has not yet triggered a flood of national outside spending. According to MPR News, outside groups spent more than $20 million during the primary election, mostly on the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) side. However, post-primary outside spending had dropped to approximately $2 million by mid-October, with about $1.3 million dedicated to pro-Flanagan freeway billboards.

National party committees have largely directed their financial resources toward Senate contests in Texas, Michigan, and Kansas. During a recent campaign stop with Tafoya on a farm near Le Sueur, Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune noted there was “positive buzz” around her candidacy, telling MPR News that translating that interest into national financial support “is something we hope to see happen.”

Key Questions Ahead of Election Day

How will undecided and independent voters shape the final outcome?

With 7% to 9% of likely voters still undecided statewide—and between 24% and 29% of independent voters uncommitted depending on the poll breakdown—the final weeks of campaigning in the Twin Cities suburbs will likely determine whether Flanagan maintains her lead or Tafoya closes the gap.

How will voters weigh the social-services fraud probe?

A critical test for both campaigns is whether voters view the federal fraud charges against more than 98 individuals primarily as a criminal matter addressed by state audits, or as a failure of executive oversight by the Walz-Flanagan administration.

How will Tafoya reconcile her abortion stance with federal policy?

As Friday’s debate approaches, voters and moderators are expected to press Tafoya on how she reconciles her self-description as pro-choice with her support for a 12-week legal limit, and how both candidates would vote on specific federal reproductive legislation.

Sources

Read More